|
America’s mortgage crisis is likely to get
considerably worse because the level of fraudulent lending to unsuitable
borrowers was much higher than previously estimated, Standard & Poor’s
said yesterday. David Wyss, the ratings agency’s chief economist, said
that defaults on high-risk “sub-prime” mortgages would continue to soar
as unqualified mortgage-holders struggled to meet their repayments,
tightening the credit markets and dragging down the American economy.
The US economy, which grew at 2.9 per cent in 2006, consequently would
grow at just 2 per cent this year and next, Mr Wyss said. This compared
with estimated growth of 3.6 per cent this year and 3.5 per cent in
2008 in the global economy. Mr Wyss told a conference in Bombay: “The
panic has subsided, but the housing market has not hit bottom yet. Housing
prices won’t hit bottom until next summer and the losses won’t peak
for another two years, until 2009. We are not halfway through this crisis
yet. Related Links * Moody’s alert on sub-prime default record “We underestimated
the extent to which fraud was occurring in the industry. It looks [as
if], based on some surveys that had been done, the extent of frauds
increased sharply in 2006.” The level of fraud increased as lenders
sought new customers through increasingly dubious means after a surge
in sub-prime home loans in recent years that had left most eligible
borrowers with mortgages. Many brokers and mortgage lenders did not
require proof of income and others helped borrowers to forge documents
that inflated their salaries, enabling them to take out bigger loans
than they could repay. They largely got away with these practices while
house prices were rising, since borrowers could remortgage their properties
and pay off the loans with the proceeds. As house prices began to stagnate,
and in many areas to fall, this option has been largely closed and the
number of defaults has surged. The number of foreclosures in the United
States jumped by 115 per cent to 243,947 in August, from the year before
– or one in 510 households, according to RealtyTrac, the housing monitor.
A foreclosure is a legal process typically set in motion when a borrower
falls 90 days behind on mortgage repayments. About 40 per cent end in
a forced sale or repossession of the house, while the bank and borrower
reach an alternative repayment schedule in the remaining cases. As foreclosures
rise, house prices inevitably fall further and increase many investors’
losses on mortage-related securities, such as sub-prime-backed bonds.
More importantly, consumers account for about two thirds of the economy
and declining house prices dent their confidence, making them less likely
to borrow and spend. The effect of the housing slump on consumer confidence
was underlined yesterday by new data that showed US retail sales in
September rose at the slowest pace in five months. Sales at stores open
for at least a year rose by 2 per cent, from the year before, according
to new research by the International Council of Shopping Centers and
UBS. Meanwhile, in a further sign that the fallout from the sub-prime
mortgage crisis is set to continue for some time, Thornburg Mortgage
yesterday increased the estimate on the loss that it will face on the
sale of $22 billion (£10.8 billion) of “high-quality”, adjust-able-rate
home loans, from $863 million to $1.1 billion. * Have your say I may
be a simple east end cockney boy but I appreciate that global economics
is linked. If the availability of credit is reduced in America, the
UK will suffer the same. Phil Bamgboye, Watford, Im from Vancouver BC
Canada and we havent had any drop in prices as of yet our prices have
supassed california and are yes unafordable for most yet homes are still
selling why I dont know???400,000 gets you a shack out of the city and
stuck in traffic.Does anyone think we are in for the same as the us
who knows.Personally im waiting for the prices in Cal and Arizona to
drop even more so I can get my piece of the sunbelt. Jim, Van, B.C.Canada
I've been on patrick.net, and every day I read the articles. There is
a huge need to "blame" someone, whether that be the appraisers who gave
faulty appraisals, the mortgage lenders for making these jumbo loans,
liar loans, fraudulent loans; the Fed for lowering the rates and then
raising them (is this really a surprise?) and then the buyers who went
out and bought the american dream, even though it was probably a 1/2
million more than they would ever be able to afford? Or the realtors
that were more concerned with their commission than the aftermath? What
about the "flippers" who turned this market into a feast for investment
rather than for families looking for a place to dwell? We could even
blame the government for allowing all of this to happen so that property
taxes could support the pork. I am opposed to the bailout 100%. I am
opposed to our government trying to tinker with what needs to level
itself out. Let ALL of the idiots who played in this game fall.
|
|
To view this page properly, ensure that any Unicode Font is installed in your system. |
|
Please insert/type your phrase in plain English (ex:-ammaa, thamiz) |
|
|